It's one of the most crushing things to know that this fort I've been using to get back into DF might eventually reach an unplayable state. I don't know it's natural cap, but I am at maybe 8-10 pretty enormous stockpiles so I was also considering looking into quantum stockpiles.īut at the same time I do rather enjoy seeing everything my fort owns laid out before me. I was considering just capping my dorf population at around 150 so that it's not an unreasonable amount of dwarves to manage but i would really hate to take away from the content of the game. Once I got to about 107 dwarves and various animals (a bunch) and tons of enemies on map my FPS fell to ~97(29/30) so I went in and played with CPU affinity and set all my other processes to CPU 1 & 2 and set dwarf fort to CPU 3, 4, 5, and 6 and got my fps up to 125-130(30) just hoping to avoid fps death on the long haul. Kitfox Discord #modding-discussion channelīronzemurder and Oilfurnace (illustrated)
#DWARF FORTRESS FPS COUNTER POSITION INSTALL#
A three step guide:ĭownload DF Classic or install the premium version from Steam or Itch.ioįollow the quickstart guide on the wiki, or see other learning resources (below)Īsk any questions in the ☼Bi-weekly DF Questions Thread☼ - it's always active See the reasons for our rules here, and please report any problems!ĭF can be intimidating, but we're dedicated to helping new players. Still OP suffers from poor management his processor is enough to handle 200 dwarves before it dips 9 fps.Want to start playing? Read this sidebar! This is pretty much the best answer you can get. Get an 8 core processor when the game can only use 1. Any simulation game where the amount of stuff you build has an effect on how quickly the simulation can run will benefit from the extra cache. It actually has more cache than the 5900X! It is a really good choice of CPU for certain types of games like Dwarf Fortress, Factorio, Cities: Skylines, RimWorld, etc. The 5800X3D chip from AMD has three times the cache of the 5800X. All CPUs have cache, and all programs tend to run faster when they have more data inside the cache, but cache is more expensive than ram so we rarely have as much cache as we would like. The signals don’t have to go very far at all, and the CPU only stalls for a handful of cycles when it reads data from the cache.
On the other hand, the CPU cache is right there inside the CPU. The signals might have to go six inches and back! During those thousands of cycles, the CPU is stalled, unable to do any useful work. Every time a program needs to read from memory, it takes thousands of clock cycles for the signals to crawl across the motherboard, arrive at the ram, be processed by the ram, then for the data to crawl back across the motherboard. The reason to get a Ryzen 7 5800X3D is because of the extra cache that it has. This makes them much slower even if they run at the same clock speed. No, an old Pentium will have a much lower IPC (Instructions Per Cycle) than a modern processor. In theory, a single core pentium running at the same GHz should perform just the same.
Originally posted by Eli:AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D is what you want for maximum Dwarf Fortress performance.
0 kommentar(er)
